ruben härle.
← All publications

Interpretability · NeurIPS 2025 Spotlight

Measuring & guiding mono­semanticity

Measuring and Guiding Monosemanticity

Making a latent feature correspond more reliably to a concept we actually care about.

Read the paper Code
Authors

R. Härle, F. Friedrich, M. Brack, S. Wäldchen, B. Deiseroth, P. Schramowski, K. Kersting

THE IDEA, AT A GLANCE

CONCEPTUAL ILLUSTRATION
ABCmixed concept representation

Measure specificity

Check how a concept is localized across features.

G-SAEguided traininglabel for A

Guide the representation

Train with labeled concepts as an additional signal.

ABCtarget A + other features

Detect & steer

Guide target A while other features can remain entangled.

Measure concept localization and disentanglement, then guide training toward designated features for the supervised concepts.

A feature that responds to many unrelated concepts is difficult to interpret and risky to steer. Sparse autoencoders help expose features, but sparsity alone does not guarantee that each feature has one clear meaning.

The Feature Monosemanticity Score measures how well a concept is captured by a single feature and how its representation is distributed across other features. Guided Sparse Autoencoders use concept labels during training to localize target concepts in designated latent dimensions.

On toxicity, writing style, and privacy attributes, guidance improved measured monosemanticity and concept detection. It also enabled more targeted steering with less degradation in generation quality than the compared methods. These findings concern the supervised target concepts, rather than guaranteeing that every learned feature has one meaning.